Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFagerlund, Annette
dc.contributor.authorHeir, Even
dc.contributor.authorMøretrø, Trond
dc.contributor.authorLangsrud, Solveig
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T11:06:31Z
dc.date.available2020-10-08T11:06:31Z
dc.date.created2020-03-02T11:33:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationMolecules. 2020, 25 (4), .
dc.identifier.issn1420-3049
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2681751
dc.description.abstractEffective cleaning and disinfection (C&D) is pivotal for the control of Listeria monocytogenes in food processing environments. Bacteria in biofilms are protected from biocidal action, and effective strategies for the prevention and removal of biofilms are needed. In this study, different C&D biofilm control strategies on pre-formed L. monocytogenes biofilms on a conveyor belt material were evaluated and compared to the effect of a conventional chlorinated, alkaline cleaner (agent A). Bacterial reductions up to 1.8 log were obtained in biofilms exposed to daily C&D cycles with normal user concentrations of alkaline, acidic, or enzymatic cleaning agents, followed by disinfection using peracetic acid. No significant differences in bactericidal effects between the treatments were observed. Seven-day-old biofilms were more tolerant to C&D than four-day-old biofilms. Attempts to optimize biofilm eradication protocols for four alkaline, two acidic, and one enzymatic cleaning agent, in accordance with the manufacturers’ recommendations, were evaluated. Increased concentrations, the number of subsequent treatments, the exposure times, and the temperatures of the C&D agents provided between 4.0 and >5.5 log reductions in colony forming units (CFU) for seven-day-old L. monocytogenes biofilms. Enhanced protocols of conventional and enzymatic C&D protocols have the potential for improved biofilm control, although further optimizations and evaluations are needed.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleListeria monocytogenes biofilm removal using different commercial cleaning agents
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber15
dc.source.volume25
dc.source.journalMolecules
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/molecules25040792
dc.identifier.cristin1798877
dc.relation.projectNofima AS: 201704
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 262306
dc.relation.projectNofima AS: 10333
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 221663
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel