Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNøstvold, Bjørg Helen
dc.contributor.authorKvalvik, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorYoung, James A
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-22T11:19:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-29T09:37:31Z
dc.date.available2015-05-22T11:19:26Z
dc.date.available2015-05-29T09:37:31Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationNofima rapportserie. 23 p. Nofima, 2013
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-8296-136-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/284248
dc.description-
dc.description.abstractThe case-studies of Sweden and the United Kingdom confirm that sustainability certification has become an established practice and is a significant factor within business to business trading. We also find that certification and consumer facing logos are more widely used in Sweden than in the UK. While the retail sector in the UK is positive towards the MSC and states that they have a need for the consumer facing logo which they do not charge for, our studies show that they to a very little degree use the logo on the products and that there is a price premium on the logoed products. Furthermore, ”responsibly sourced” is a far more used statement facing the consumer as a concept than is claims of sustainability. UK producers are more sceptical towards certification and MSC in particular. They support the mission of the MSC but think the organisation has become far too large and commercial. In Sweden the respondents in the study have a higher confidence in the MSC, but also the WWF traffic light lists and KRAV. They do not see the need for other options. Even though the majority of frozen products are MSC branded, there is no logo in the seafood counter. The more luxurious the counter the less likely the purchasers are willing to see the MSC as a necessary sustainability certifier, or the necessity of certification at all. In general it is accepted that the consumer does not use the logo at point of purchase but relies on the supermarket taking the responsibility for sustainability. This raises the question of the necessity of a consumer facing logo.
dc.description.abstractCase-studier av det britiske og svenske markedet viser at bærekraftssertifisering er et godt etablert kjøpskriterium, selv om de fleste også kjøper ikke-sertifisert fisk. De to markedene er ulike både i holdning til MSC og bruk av logo mot forbruker. I Sverige er aktørene positive til bærekraftssertifisering generelt og til MSC. I Storbritannia er meningene mer delte, hvor supermarkedene er positive og produsentene mer negative til MSC. I Sverige er det meste av fryste produkter MSC-merket, men vi fant ingen ferskvaredisker som var sertifisert, selv om de kjøper MSC-sertifisert fisk. I Storbritannia argumenterte supermarkedene for nødvendigheten av å bruke logoen på produktene, men butikkundersøkelsene viser at det finnes lite MSC-merkede produkter. Vi stiller derfor spørsmål ved nødvendigheten av å ha en sertifisering rettet mot forbruker.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.urihttps://nofimaas.sharepoint.com/sites/public/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=mt1hUovBeuKA7eTTkZCjglljzN0e7NTFCUp9cBYB77c%3d&docid=0ac639fda63a04836a97b3ab189c230af
dc.titleSustainability certification and the market - Case studies of the United Kingdom and Sweden
dc.title.alternativeRapport/Report 45/2013, norsk sammendrag
dc.typeResearch report
dc.date.updated2015-05-22T11:19:26Z
dc.identifier.cristin1063284
dc.relation.projectFiskeri- og havbruksnæringens forskningsfond: 900546
dc.relation.projectEgen institusjon: 21133


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel